Part III · Campus Life & Student Well-Being

The Comfort Room Divide

A Comparative Study of Male and Female Students’ Satisfaction with School Restroom Facilities at Ilaya Barangka Integrated School

p = 0.48
no statistically significant gap between male (3.58) and female (3.29) satisfaction

At a Glance

Design
Descriptive-comparative
Domains
4 satisfaction domains
Respondents
89 SHS students (F = 48, M = 41)
Finding
No significant difference (p = 0.48)

Research Summary

This descriptive-comparative study examined how Senior High School students at IBIS evaluate restroom facilities in terms of cleanliness, privacy, accessibility, and usability. Using survey responses from 89 students and structured restroom observations, the study found mixed satisfaction overall: the largest group reported neutral satisfaction, male students posted a slightly higher overall mean than female students, and the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.48). Observation data, however, revealed recurring facility gaps in toilet flushing, water availability, hygiene-supply consistency, and some privacy-related hardware issues.

Objectives

  • Determine the level of student satisfaction with school restroom facilities at IBIS.
  • Compare male and female students’ satisfaction in cleanliness, privacy, accessibility, and usability.
  • Identify specific restroom conditions that students consider most problematic.
  • Recommend practical improvements to enhance restroom adequacy and student satisfaction.

Context & Method

Access to clean, safe, and functional school restrooms supports student health, dignity, and learning readiness. Guided by the Department of Education’s WinS standards, the study treats school restrooms not as minor support spaces but as essential learning infrastructure. Because gender-based needs may shape restroom experiences, the research asks whether male and female students differ in satisfaction levels and which facility conditions require the most immediate response. The resulting evidence links lived student experience with inspection-based observation, allowing school leaders to compare perception data with actual conditions inside the facilities.

  • Descriptive-comparative design was used to measure and compare male and female students’ satisfaction levels.
  • The study was conducted at IBIS with 89 SHS respondents (Female n = 48; Male n = 41).
  • A Likert-scale Restroom Satisfaction Survey measured four domains: cleanliness, privacy, accessibility, and usability.
  • A Restroom Observation Checklist documented functional conditions such as flushing, locks, water availability, and hygiene supplies.
  • Weighted means, frequencies, percentages, and an independent-samples t-test were used for analysis.
Overall satisfaction · five-point scale
Male students
3.58
Female students
3.29

Difference not statistically significant · p = 0.48

Fig. 1Weighted-mean comparison across the four domains; male means run slightly higher, but the overall difference is not statistically significant.
Inspection photos of IBIS restroom facilities showing storage items in toilet areas, broken fixtures, graffiti, improvised partitions, and urinals in disrepair
Fig. 2Field inspection photographs of IBIS Senior High School restroom facilities: storage items occupying toilet areas, broken fixtures, graffiti on walls, improvised partitions, and urinal sections in disrepair. These conditions document the cleanliness and usability gaps driving the 3.43 weighted-mean satisfaction rating across 89 student respondents.

Key Findings

  • The largest response group reported neutral overall satisfaction, indicating mixed student experience rather than strong approval.
  • Male students posted a slightly higher overall mean (3.58) than female students (3.29), but the difference was not statistically significant.
  • Privacy received some of the strongest ratings, yet maintenance-related concerns remained persistent across other domains.
  • Observation data showed frequent issues in toilet flushing, continuous water availability, and regular provision of hygiene supplies.
  • The evidence suggests that facility-management quality matters more than gender alone in explaining satisfaction outcomes.

Implications & Recommended Actions

  • Prioritize repair of flushing systems and routine clog-prevention checks.
  • Improve water pressure and ensure continuous water availability during peak-use periods.
  • Adopt a checklist-based cleaning and restocking schedule for soap, tissue, and sanitary supplies.
  • Strengthen vandalism control and restore locks, dividers, and privacy-related fixtures.
  • Use periodic restroom audits to align maintenance work with actual student experience.
89Respondents
48 / 41Female / Male
4Domains
p = 0.48No sig. difference

“Restroom adequacy shapes health, dignity, and classroom readiness. When the basic conditions of sanitation fail, student satisfaction reflects not just comfort, but the quality of everyday school management.”

Research Team — Grade 12
Portrait of the The Comfort Room Divide student research team
Research Adviser
Mr. Franklin D. Garvida
Student Researchers
Juliana Victoria M. Venoza, Jenecy A. Babula, Jeliane L. Rellin, Kristine R. Garcia, John Lawrence L. Boncay, Angelo P. Tolentino, Marvin M. Agcol, Thrisha Mae T. Fernandez, Elizamae Cheska T. San Juan
Keywords restroom facilities; student satisfaction; WASH in Schools; sanitation; Senior High School